Senator Claire McCaskill wants to end oil subsidies. I'm dumbfounded and disappointed. Why is it always that the Dems seem to have everything backwards and are always high on glue?

Madam senator, have you not been reading my blog with your eyes open? If you had been paying attention, you would see that it's government money going to the windmills that is the problem, not oil. Oil subsidies are an integral part of keeping the oil industry happy. Are you anti-industry, madam senator? In this country, we appreciate capitalism, and we frown upon communism, murder, and rape. There is nothing more capitalism than the big oil companies. How could you possibly be against that? You're not pro-murder too, are you??? It is simply unbelievable to me that any Dem senator who is pro-murder could remain in power. How do brainless pro-murder Dems expect a truly capitalist company to survive in this day and age without government handouts?

Madam senator, are you trying to make all Americans equally poor? Oil companies are successful because government subsidies keep them afloat and highly profitable. Are you against success, madam senator? Success is as much a part of America as winning wars, defeating the French, and baseballs. It would seem that you want to see an America where all of us are poor, because you can't seem to stand seeing anyone get ahead on their own through the blessing of the government. You feel that success deserves to be punished, by making those who achieve it to suffer with the same government treatment as the unsuccessful, the worthless, the poor. How can someone who is wealthy because of subsidies stay wealthy if you stop giving them money? This is nothing but anti-wealthy politics, and it's un-American. You probably just want to greedily keep that money for yourself, so that you can give it away to the greedy money-lusting wind industry and the less fortunate, while keeping it away from the entrepreneurial, go-getting oilmen.

What will happen if you cut off this vital source of income to the oil industry? The oil companies, well accustomed to a lavish life of high profits, aren't going to simply adapt to a new life of poverty. They will require an additional source of income to make up for it. Where will they get it? From the American car-owning tax-payer, through even higher gas prices. Why should tax-payers be forced to pay for what the government refuses to shell out for? Subsidies are a small ransom that we would gladly have you pay on the behalf of all Americans, when compared to the looming threat the oil companies could easily make if you don't pay up.

Yes madam senator, a few billion dollars in subsidies is a small price to pay to keep the American dream propped up and to fight against the terror of expensive gas.

A lot of the chicken-littles are worried about "peak oil."

What is peak oil? Peak oil is the hypotheoretical day that the oil suddenly completely runs out (from the French "pique" which means "To cause to feel resentment or indignation", which is what the greenies expect to feel when we somehow magically use up all the oil). What a ridiculous proposition. Think about it, folks. One day there's all the oil we could ever want to use in a million lifetimes, and the next day it's suddenly all gone?! Where do they think it will go? Into thin air?! Idiots.

It's just not possible for us to use up all the oil. There are practically infinity barrels of the stuff. I've said it before and I'll say it again: It's simply impossible that humans can have any influence at all on the environment. Humans are just too small (on average only about 4 feet tall), and the world is just too big. Carbon dioxins, disappearing rainforests, polluted rivers and lakes and oceans, ever-increasing ratio of paved land -- these are all the result of natural processes. We couldn't harm the environment even if we tried a lot harder than we're trying now. Something small cannot have an effect on something big; that's just common sense logic, folks. It's like saying you could poison yourself with just one poison pill. It just doesn't happen. You have to eat the whole bottle.

Think about it, folks. Oil has been created under ground over billions of years. How can something that's been made for so long be used up in any imaginable amount of time? Imagine filling up your gas tank, but instead of spending 10 minutes pouring gas in, imagine spending a billion years pouring it in to the tank. That's literally a million times the amount of gas you usually get. That tank would be pretty damn full. You're not going to run out of gas any time soon! Nature has been pouring gas into the Earth's tank for billions of years, so it will probably take a few trillion years before we get through it all.

But wait a minute. The Earth made all that oil for us out of dead animals. If animals keep dying, nature keeps on making oil. That's why it's called a renewable resource. This is why the greenies want to save all the animals. If there are no more animals dying, there's no more oil being made, and then they get rich when dirty wind energy prices skyrocket and they make a killing on cash from congress. But animals dying is a natural process. So I say we keep killing all the animals we can. Then we never run out of oil, and the greenies' little investment scam doesn't pay off.

I don't know why the idiot scientist greenies just don't get it. It's scientifically impossible to run out of a renewable resource. By definition, all the used-up reserves of that resource get renewed. The more we use up oil, the more it's just going to be there again. It doesn't make sense to me why we haven't put an oil rig on each and every square foot of the planet... but I know why we haven't. It's because those money-grubbing greens have been reading a bit too much Richard Marx and can't stand the idea of patriotic American oil companies earning even a meager profit for their hard work. Go back to Russia, you commies! Stop trying to make an advantageous gain or return on your windmills, and let someone else earn an honest profit for a change.

Here's some proof that crude oil is "clean oil." In Naftalan, they soak in it! Yes, those lucky citizens in whatever country that is where congress clearly has their head in the right end, they get to bathe in the stuff.

bath
n. 1. a. The act of soaking or cleansing the body, as in water or steam.

And here's proof that CO² is clean:


I've looked at CO², which I obtained by breathing it out. Even using a magnifying glass, I could not see hardly any dirt in it.


But what about wind power?

Have you ever left a window open, and then later looked at the window sill? What's there? That's dirt! And where'd it come from? The wind! That's proof, folks! We nailed that coffin hard!


Case closed!!!